We needed a third centre half because we were hanging on by the fingertips against a third rate Russian team who we never looked like putting awayfornicate i hate this 3-5-2 bullshit. Why did we need the 3rd cb. And good lord at those subs. Than fornicate we got through that
Yet another game where we tried to expend as little energy as possible and still come away with the win, this has become a pattern over the last couple of months. This was a "safety first" formation designed to make sure that Rostov didn't get close to an away goal until we had the game wrapped up and on ice and if we had converted the chances we had in the opening half the game would have been done and over with. I am concerned about our piss poor finishing but I would be really if we where not creating chances then. In the Rostov (and against Chelsea) I would put some of blame for our finishing down to a lack of player in our attack. At best we had three attacking players; Mata, MicjkyT and Zlatan, against Rostov and they faced a packed penalty area. I can think of only one sequence of play where all three of them touch the ball during an attack and that was on Mata's goal.
I agree that you and i see many games differentlyREDMARIA - I have said many time that you and I watch the games through different spectacles. If this team won the treble you would still complain; your hatred of the Glazers I'd like a cancel that doesn't allow you to enjoy anything to do with United anymore.
If you are not happy with the way United are being run what are you doing about it, other than bitching about it.
Users browsing this forum: Short Back and Sides