I assume your point is that he wants to follow the constitution when it is convenient for him, but ignore it when it isn't. They flaw in your statement comes from your understanding of the 2nd and 14th amendments. Trump is consistent in wanting to follow the constitution based on it's original intent. Hence my explaining the original intent of the 14th amendment to you.
Just a heads up, the house will probably go Democrat (although personally I don't think it's a close or sure thing as they are saying), and the Senate will stay Republican, maybe even picking up a couple seats. If that happens it's not a blowout referendum on Trump, it's business as usual because the first midterm after a new president is elected usually goes to the opposition party. Obama won in 2008 and other than him winning in 2012 the democrats lost everything for the next 6 years. I can't imagine Trump doing anywhere near that bad.raycreative wrote: ↑Thu Nov 01, 2018 10:11 pmSte you are wasting your time
Four more sleeps and the scene will be set
I predict the Democtats will have a massive win
The only people that will vote for Trumps lot are the rednecks and the hicks who just want everybody else to have the same shit lives as they have
They also get the Evangelical christians who openly admit Trump is an immoral birth canal but is a better option to them than Hilary as the Trumper is anti abortion and god will save his soul
He gets a few with signs that say Women for Trump and Blacks for Trump
They remind me of the tossers at the front that wave at the TV screen when the ball goes out of play.5 seconds of glory
Trump will them blame every Republican he can think of and decide to work on presidential decree only
At that time i think Muller will appear and shit on him
The only bit i am missing is that they should deport every pretty Eastern european woman and her parents and build a wall and keep them out and leave him with his kids and his hookers
You literally take evrything the worlds most proven complusive liar says as gospel but you go on about others delusion and brainwashingRelly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:13 pmHey Sandies, have you ever had an original thought in your life? I have been mentioning Soros on here for years and you never once conflated that with "jews" until the MSM started using that as a diversion tactic.
I genuinely feel sorry for people as brainwashed as you, you should learn to think for yourself. I could literally pre-write most of your posts before you do. Honestly when I have seen you have posted in here I know what you've said before I read it. Obviously I can't prove this to you, but I can tell you it's almost without fail.
What impeachable offense has Trump committed? And if you are going to discuss a topic you should get educated on it. Impeachment requires a 2/3 vote from the senate, do you really think a republican senate is going to impeach Trump?raycreative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:35 pmwait and see
i think he will shortly be impeached
I really do.I truly do.Yes i do.I really do
But that will be down to the Mexican caravan
Wait and see
You see anybody can talk like an idiot as the Trumper does
You genuinely believe the "intent" of the second amendment is to put AR-15 assault rifles in the hands of fornicate crazies?Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:20 pmI assume your point is that he wants to follow the constitution when it is convenient for him, but ignore it when it isn't. They flaw in your statement comes from your understanding of the 2nd and 14th amendments. Trump is consistent in wanting to follow the constitution based on it's original intent. Hence my explaining the original intent of the 14th amendment to you.
If I am wrong as to your point, then please explain it to me, because I am genuinely not getting it.
Trump wont be impeached. He never willraycreative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:35 pmwait and see
i think he will shortly be impeached
I really do.I truly do.Yes i do.I really do
But that will be down to the Mexican caravan
Wait and see
You see anybody can talk like an idiot as the Trumper does
What a wonderful warm human being he is eh?Sandies wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 12:51 amTrump wont be impeached. He never willraycreative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:35 pmwait and see
i think he will shortly be impeached
I really do.I truly do.Yes i do.I really do
But that will be down to the Mexican caravan
Wait and see
You see anybody can talk like an idiot as the Trumper does
Everyone around him will continue to get locked up and fall on their sword but hes the cocroach you cant squash
You think our parliament is squeaky clean ?raycreative wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:05 amWhat a wonderful warm human being he is eh?Sandies wrote: ↑Sat Nov 03, 2018 12:51 amTrump wont be impeached. He never willraycreative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:35 pmwait and see
i think he will shortly be impeached
I really do.I truly do.Yes i do.I really do
But that will be down to the Mexican caravan
Wait and see
You see anybody can talk like an idiot as the Trumper does
Everyone around him will continue to get locked up and fall on their sword but hes the cocroach you cant squash
The leader of the free world
How do you try to tell your kids to be like the most important leader in your life should be
Let's work through his morals
Husband and family man
How many wives has he had?
How many kids does he admit to by how many different wives?
How many affairs has he had?
I know he will claim he has never had an affair so why does he insist on paying women off?Probably just because he's just a nice guy
Why does Stormy Daniels tell the world his cock is shaped like "Super Mario" if he's never screwed her?
I wonder if Melania will stay with him when all the shit does hit the fan.And it will.It really will.It truly will.Wait and see
At the moment she gets a new dress a day.Her parents are well looked after even though she and her entire family come from what the Trumper would call a shit hole country that had a zillion refugees when the war was on.
Business
How many votes do you think he gets from all the business's he didn't pay when his corporations filed for banruptcies
What a great guy and what a great businessman he is.He really is.He truly is.Wait and see
The only reason he still has Thump Tower is that he owed the banks that much they couldn't let him go bust
Instead the banks fired all the individuals who were sucked in to giving him the loans
We know he is self made.His father didn't give him anything.
Honestly,truly,really.Wait and see
People who worked for the Trumper who now have or shortly will have shattered lives
So many people are forced into lying and plain illegal activities include
Michael Flynn-Forced to do a plea deal confirming that "Somebody in the Trump" top team made him contact the Russians.Remember very clearly that Trump has denied this.Truly,really,it is a witch hunt.Let's wait for Muller
Reince Priebus
Scaramucci-Didn't last a week
Sean Spicer-Will never work again because he is Trump liar and believed every piece of crap mthat was fed to him.Ben do you know anybody else that does that?Wait and see
Is suspect Sarah Huckeby Sanders will soon be toast
Steve Bannon-He struggles find the truth as well but his lies were just not good enough
Tom Price-Got fed up trying to explain where he spent half a million dollars on travel
Rob Porter-Left after accusations of domestic violence.He didn't do it.Obviously
Rex Tillerson
His lawyers are going to end up in jail for lying on his behalf and making payments he "cough cough" knew nothing about to hookers he didn't have an affair with
I am surprised Katie Price hasn't been to Washinton yet as she is not shy but she is broke.That fits the Trumper profile
Leaders he lines himself up with include the worlds best
Putin-Well i am sure Trump owes him money and a lot of it
Duterte
The Suadi Royal family-Well they bring in lots of money.They don't just kill innocents and suppress women as some cynical sods think
Kim Jong-Un-Si is he "little rocket man" or will the Trumper build a Trump tower with somebody else's money in North Korea?
I think when Muller has finished following the cash he will end up with a shit load of illegal activity and money laundering etc from Russia.
Well that's my opinion.
It truly is.It really is.Honestly.Wait and see
I have no evidence but evidence seems to be totally unimportant to this lying,bigoted and racist piece of crap
So who's left for the Trump
Red necks and hicks who just want everybody to be as broke as them
Miners who believe Trump will soon open mystery coal mines that don't exist
Healthy people who don't realise they no longer have health care but don't need it at the moment
And a few rich people who make their money on the New York stock exchange
The party's over
It was Obama, but Hillary was his secretary of state. I mean the fact that he left office and ISIS was all but gone a few months later is pretty indicative of this fact.
If Sigmar says ISIS was created in the UK then he must be correct
Now his lapdog Sanders posts a doctored video of the incident. Fake news agenda though
I would say that sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but thats doing a disservice to Oscar Wilde. and implying you have some form of intelligence.raycreative wrote: ↑Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:10 amIf Sigmar says ISIS was created in the UK then he must be correct
Al least he isn't blaming Jose for it which is a big plus
I totally agree with this. You know what the biggest problem is? There is no identification required to vote. So a bunch of those people you are waiting behind might not even be citizens, or they may have voted previously in other states, etc. For some reason the democrats thinks it's racist to ask for ID. Personally, if you're the group that thinks it's impossible for black people to obtain legal identification then you're probably the racist.Sandies wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:12 pmWouldn't call it a good night. But it wasn't a bad one. Expected result and nothing will change.
I think the voting process in USA is really flawed. 2 of my mates in order to vote had to travel 3 hours to the nearest poll and wait 4 hours in line. Where is the incentive to go through this ordeal. Some of the lines in contested states was up to 7/8 hours.
When I vote, its a 15 minute process. There are 5 polling stations within a 5km radius of my house and the line is no longer than 15 minutes
I think that is something that needs to change to really encourage voters to come out and portray a true democracy
Don't be so daft Sandies. Is there any conspiracy theory you don't believe? Watch this video, this guy made that video and demonstrates that it's accurate.
I voted in the state of Texas. I'm not sure which state you refer to in saying there's no identification required to vote. Please tell me more.Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:25 pmI totally agree with this. You know what the biggest problem is? There is no identification required to vote. So a bunch of those people you are waiting behind might not even be citizens, or they may have voted previously in other states, etc. For some reason the democrats thinks it's racist to ask for ID. Personally, if you're the group that thinks it's impossible for black people to obtain legal identification then you're probably the racist.Sandies wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:12 pmWouldn't call it a good night. But it wasn't a bad one. Expected result and nothing will change.
I think the voting process in USA is really flawed. 2 of my mates in order to vote had to travel 3 hours to the nearest poll and wait 4 hours in line. Where is the incentive to go through this ordeal. Some of the lines in contested states was up to 7/8 hours.
When I vote, its a 15 minute process. There are 5 polling stations within a 5km radius of my house and the line is no longer than 15 minutes
I think that is something that needs to change to really encourage voters to come out and portray a true democracy
Sigh! Ok, the video isn't doctored but it doesn't mean it was accurate either. This is semantics so I will leave it and go straight to the matter.Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:27 pmDon't be so daft Sandies. Is there any conspiracy theory you don't believe? Watch this video, this guy made that video and demonstrates that it's accurate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAmE3K7nneI
By the way, this was another example of you posting something and I knew you were going to before you ever did. Never miss a CNN talking point!
Only 2/3 of states require ID to vote. Of those only half require it to be photo ID, meaning you can borrow anyones ID because there is no way of varying if it's actually yours.RED3bution wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:03 pmI voted in the state of Texas. I'm not sure which state you refer to in saying there's no identification required to vote. Please tell me more.Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:25 pmI totally agree with this. You know what the biggest problem is? There is no identification required to vote. So a bunch of those people you are waiting behind might not even be citizens, or they may have voted previously in other states, etc. For some reason the democrats thinks it's racist to ask for ID. Personally, if you're the group that thinks it's impossible for black people to obtain legal identification then you're probably the racist.Sandies wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:12 pmWouldn't call it a good night. But it wasn't a bad one. Expected result and nothing will change.
I think the voting process in USA is really flawed. 2 of my mates in order to vote had to travel 3 hours to the nearest poll and wait 4 hours in line. Where is the incentive to go through this ordeal. Some of the lines in contested states was up to 7/8 hours.
When I vote, its a 15 minute process. There are 5 polling stations within a 5km radius of my house and the line is no longer than 15 minutes
I think that is something that needs to change to really encourage voters to come out and portray a true democracy
I didn't say it was assault. There was contact made between the two, initiated by Acosta's actions, but I don't believe it was intentional or harmful. However his performance that evening was a disgrace. No matter who is president there is a certain amount of respect that should be paid to the position. Grandstanding and talking over top of the POTUS to make a name for yourself is despicable. On top of that he was disrespecting his colleagues and preventing anyone else from asking questions.RED3bution wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:14 pmSigh! Ok, the video isn't doctored but it doesn't mean it was accurate either. This is semantics so I will leave it and go straight to the matter.Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:27 pmDon't be so daft Sandies. Is there any conspiracy theory you don't believe? Watch this video, this guy made that video and demonstrates that it's accurate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAmE3K7nneI
By the way, this was another example of you posting something and I knew you were going to before you ever did. Never miss a CNN talking point!
The claim by the white house ala Sanders that Accosta assaulted the young intern is so much BS that I think it shows the divide between both political factions. They look at the same video and come to different interpretations. Thankfully we have a guide which is the law.
Pay attention, if you'd like me to tell you why the white house claim is mile-high BS say so but yeah the video doesn't look doctored to me but it was offered as evidence for a somewhat serious allegation and used as a justification for a dictator-like move.
Hahahaha.....Ok Let's not make this about Acosta. So do you think the WH is being honest in revoking Acosta's pass because he laid his hands on a female intern as pushed forward by Sanders?Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:23 pmI didn't say it was assault. There was contact made between the two, initiated by Acosta's actions, but I don't believe it was intentional or harmful. However his performance that evening was a disgrace. No matter who is president there is a certain amount of respect that should be paid to the position. Grandstanding and talking over top of the POTUS to make a name for yourself is despicable. On top of that he was disrespecting his colleagues and preventing anyone else from asking questions.RED3bution wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:14 pmSigh! Ok, the video isn't doctored but it doesn't mean it was accurate either. This is semantics so I will leave it and go straight to the matter.Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:27 pm
Don't be so daft Sandies. Is there any conspiracy theory you don't believe? Watch this video, this guy made that video and demonstrates that it's accurate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAmE3K7nneI
By the way, this was another example of you posting something and I knew you were going to before you ever did. Never miss a CNN talking point!
The claim by the white house ala Sanders that Accosta assaulted the young intern is so much BS that I think it shows the divide between both political factions. They look at the same video and come to different interpretations. Thankfully we have a guide which is the law.
Pay attention, if you'd like me to tell you why the white house claim is mile-high BS say so but yeah the video doesn't look doctored to me but it was offered as evidence for a somewhat serious allegation and used as a justification for a dictator-like move.
Acosta is a loser of the highest order. He should have had his press pass revoked long ago.
Or.... Just watch the video and no such assault occurred. Its another example of you believing the lies of the white house blindly.Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:27 pmDon't be so daft Sandies. Is there any conspiracy theory you don't believe? Watch this video, this guy made that video and demonstrates that it's accurate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAmE3K7nneI
By the way, this was another example of you posting something and I knew you were going to before you ever did. Never miss a CNN talking point!
Again, supporting the suppressing of freedom of the press. Remember the reaction to Obamas admin wanting to ban a fox news presenter. All Acosta did is ask a question Trump didnt like. Pretty pathetic of you to go over his behaviour when Trump constantly attacks American citzens every day for daring to ask him a question or report facts.Relly wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:20 pmI didn't say it was assault. There was contact made between the two, initiated by Acosta's actions, but I don't believe it was intentional or harmful. However his performance that evening was a disgrace. No matter who is president there is a certain amount of respect that should be paid to the position. Grandstanding and talking over top of the POTUS to make a name for yourself is despicable. On top of that he was disrespecting his colleagues and preventing anyone else from asking questions.
Acosta is a loser of the highest order. He should have had his press pass revoked long ago.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
